is this the naked truth?

the bare-naked truth: obviously someone need to check up Dr. Vanezis's bank account.

Earlier today in court, Dr Pornthip testified that she disagreed with the findings of Dr Peter Vanezis, the British forensic pathologist brought in by the MACC to observe Teoh's second post mortem last year. Dr Pornthip was also an observer.

“I still believe he was unconscious because there is no significant pathology to show he was conscious (when he fell),” she said, adding there were no signs of bilateral wrist fractures, so “I cannot confirm he was fully conscious.”

She disagreed with Dr Vanezis that Teoh broke his fall with his feet because she said there were no fractures on both ankles and wrists.

Dr Pornthip also disagreed with Dr Vanezis’s finding that neck injuries were caused by impact of fall. She pointed out that the neck was a protected area.

She said she found hemorrhaging on the neck which was bigger than what would have been caused by a fall. She and her staff reviewed 30 other cases at her institute and they did not find similar injuries.

She concluded it was impossible that the wound was caused by the fall.

On Teoh’s spinal injuries, she reviewed six cases at her institute and found no contusion under the skin as was the case with Teoh